« Seminars | Main | What's the Deal with Teen Writing? »

May 10, 2006

Comments

armindalmattoon

I think that this article is a practically perfect ending to our class--it really wraps up what we have been talking about all semester. I always enjoy reading about teachers that have actually implemented what Karen and 619 in general are advocating.

I thought that Silva points out a lot of interesting ways to work with her students, such as the sticky notes on the first day of class. The conversations after this exercise are like "killing two birds with one stone." The kids "think we have not begun our year yet" while she has "lay[ed] the groundwork for all the work we will do together."

Silva makes a lot of good points, many of which Jack has already outlined here. I think an important point that she makes is that "I like to read, but reading a book is enough for me most of the time. Sometimes I want to talk about a book I have read, or ask questions about it. I never want to design a new cover, write a character sketch, or trace the theme of the story. I do not want to adopt the persona of the protagonist and preform in class or track symbols throughout the story." Which I think is the perfect introduction to the title..."Can We Read Today, or Do We Hafta Do English?" ...no wonder kids ask this question!

Karen

NICE, Arminda...I agree w/Silva about those "activities" we ask kids to do w/books they read.

Why do we do that? KES

Dave E.

Jack, excellent job pulling out the fine points of this article. Jenn did an excellent job in her post as well, especially drawing out the part where reading is discussed as a bedtime activity... which it totally is. I only read in bed. Even if I'm reading in the middle of the day, I still crawl into bed to do it. Of course, I really have no other comfortable place to sit in this lousy apartment, but that's another story.

I also liked this response to parents who want Silva to "push the classics" on the students: "I ask them to list the classics on their bookshelves." Nice. I will go to my grave arguing that students shouldn't *have* to read the "classics." Students don't enjoy the classics; Silva pretty much affirms that earlier in the article when she says "Most of the books on the negative side are books assigned for school." School-assigned books are of no interest to 95% of students, because many of them were written 50, 75, 100, 500 (Shakespeare) years ago in language that kids just can't even try to care about.

I pulled that percentage out of midair, but I'll defend its accuracy. I'll defend pretty much anything.

jmachampagne

Dave, I'm so glad you said that! I've been feeling that way all semester. Many of my future students will most likely be reluctant readers (broad generalization I know but fairly true with Special Education students). I wonder if they will be able to comprehend, enjoy and relate to the "classics." I get the impression that if they don't, they aren't "worthy" of literature. I feel that if I cram these books down their throats and they hate them, I will be ruining their impression of reading which will prevent them from reading on their own. You're right, how can all students relate to books that are 50, 75, 100, 500 years old? And if I force them to, aren't I depriving them of the positive impact of literature?
Don't worry, I'll defend your made up numbers with you!
~Jenn

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2006

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Our Lit/Critics

  • Dawn Larson
  • Nancy Korba
  • Matt Watkins
  • Matt Fuentes
  • Jesse Daugherty
  • Laura Schilly
  • Betsy Meldrim
  • Chrissy Gates
  • James Beach
  • Nick Pietropaolo
Blog powered by Typepad