Thompson’s article surveys the reading lists of Seattles
At the private school, the curriculum also includes contemporary works; however the schools approach does not seem as accepting of new literature. Texts by contemporary or women writers are offered as optional, while Homer, Virgil, Chaucer are required. Does optional mean additional reading? If it does, I doubt many students will read extra school books. And the students that decide to read the optional books are not likely the reluctant readers. In addition, the private school’s English department chair, seems to have missed the boat. He advocates that the classics can develop critical thinking and expose students to different perspectives. Obviously the classics have the potential to inspire students, but if students are not engaged, how much critical thinking is being developed?
In considering the differences in public and private school, is it true that public schools have more variety while being more politically correct? Furthermore, is it true that secondary students in the ‘60’s and 70’s read more books that reflected their interests than in 80’s, 90’s, or today?
Matt
Comments