Nick and Jack are total losers and slackers for waiting until just now to post their responses to seminars. That being said, here are my responses to seminars:
Chris (Walter Dean Myers): Your pre-reading activites were really great. The worksheet on recognizing racism, which we did and discussed in the seminar itself, was especially thought-provoking. Many of your other handouts (S.O.A.P.S., Character Logs, etc.) just go to show me how great you are/have been/will be as a teacher. I can and will steal such ideas from you. The articles you chose were also very useful and gave us much fodder for our discussion of race as an issue.
As far as your discussion of Myers himself, and of his novels, you did an excellent job explaining to us just why his books are so good and so real. The "real" part is most interesting to me, as (like we've discussed) many YA books seem to come to a happy resolution at the end where everyone gets what they want or what they deserve. From what you've told me about Myers' work, though, it comes to more realistic conclusions for the characters. You definitely interested me to read Myers, not just because the books sounded good, but also because they would give me perspective on a voice I don't often relate with. Thanks.
Jesse (humor): First of all, Jesse, thanks so much for the CDs! They get played when I need a pick-me-up, which for the past few weeks has been at about 3:00 every Thursday afternoon. I just needed to enjoy myself for an hour or so before getting... well, you know. Before getting on with it.
Our discussion was great because I had never really thought about the sad nature of many YA novels. The article explaining the concept of the "problem novel" to me was really fascinating, discussing the popularity of "realistic sad books." It just seems odd that kids, who are (by definition) preparing for the rest of their lives, are being led towards books which simply tell them that the world is a horrible place and, in order to reach that "happy ending," you need to scratch and claw and fight. Kids love to laugh and to have fun. Exposing them to funny books shouldn't be frowned upon. It just doesn't seem fair that such novels are considered fluff and not valuable to the developing person.
Plus, we had a fun time in your seminar. Well done.
Arminda (Ann Rinaldi): I enjoy historical fiction. Your seminar was very good in that the author you chose dabbles in many different eras of history and writes differing stories for each one. While, sure, they all were along the same young-girl-in-love thread, they all approached it differently and with different historical backgrounds and subplots. One of the best things you did in your seminar was selling the books -- I could tell you really enjoyed them personally and would be thrilled to have any of we guys from your seminar to "cross-over" and read one.
The pre-reading activities you gave, showing the definite connection between these novels and knowledge of history, would thrill any history teacher who saw your class as a prime opportunity for collaborative teaching. What we discussed in the seminar, though, about determining factual accuracy (dates, locations of events, etc.) would be key before introducing these novels in a classroom. From what you said, though, Rinaldi does a thorough job of researching and makes sure her novels match up with the history books.
Great job, Arminda!
Matt W (music): Yeah, so I just kind of dropped in on your seminar last minute and hung out. However, you really impressed me with your passion for the subject you chose. The pre-seminar activity you chose (describing a moment in your life defined by music) was interesting, but your example simply blew me away. Very awesome.
Your choice of books was excellent, as you moved across boundaries of musical genre. I might be wrong, but I imagine the hip-hop book was a bit out of your comfort level. Regardless, you spoke of each book with equal flair and gave excellent rationalities for why each of them would be good for high school students to read and what lessons each of them teaches. The activities you chose, from the outside-the-box one of writing a song to the more traditional one of reading a non-fiction piece from the same musical genre, showed a great range of creativity and motivation as a teacher. I agree with Jacqueline that you must never be referred to as a "slacker" again. Excellent work.
-Dave
Recent Comments